Select any high-risk areas your intended AI systems will touch. This triggers stricter readiness thresholds aligned with EU AI Act obligations:
If any are selected, minimum thresholds increase from 40% to 60% for Data Readiness and Risk & Governance.
Consensus View (Multi-Respondent Analysis)
Maturity Radar
Recommended Next Steps
ISO/IEC 42001:2023 AI Management System Alignment
Your control gaps mapped to ISO 42001 clauses. This report shows compliance coverage and priority areas for certification readiness.
EU AI Act Compliance Checklist
High-risk AI system requirements mapped to your assessment. Generated based on selected risk areas.
AI Readiness Assessment — Executive Summary
Overall Score:
Maturity Level:
Dimension Scores
Top Priority Gaps
90-Day Action Plan
Assessment aligned with NIST AI RMF, ISO/IEC 42001, ISO/IEC 23894, and EU AI Act.
Standards-mapped control gaps available in detailed report.
Methodology & Standards Alignment
Your AI Readiness Score is calculated using a weighted assessment model that reflects real-world AI implementation priorities and aligns with internationally recognized frameworks:
Data Readiness (40%) – Clean, accessible data is the foundation of any AI initiative
Risk & Governance (30%) – Compliance and ethical frameworks gate enterprise AI adoption
Technical Capability (10%) – Supporting infrastructure for deployment
Business Alignment (10%) – Clear use cases and ROI expectations
Organizational Culture (10%) – Team readiness and change management
Standards Framework
This assessment is mapped to leading AI governance frameworks:
NIST AI RMF – AI Risk Management Framework organizing controls into Govern, Map, Measure, and Manage functions
[Reference]
ISO/IEC 42001:2023 – AI Management Systems (AIMS) requirements
[Reference]
ISO/IEC 23894:2023 – AI Risk Management guidance
[Reference]
EU AI Act – Risk-based regulatory framework (phased implementation 2024-2027)
[Reference]
Gating Logic & Risk Classification
Organizations must achieve minimum thresholds in critical dimensions (Data Readiness ≥40%, Risk & Governance ≥40%) to progress beyond "Exploring" maturity.
High-risk use cases (employment decisions, credit scoring, critical infrastructure) trigger elevated minimum requirements aligned with EU AI Act obligations (Data Readiness & Risk/Governance ≥60%).
Note: This is a directional assessment based on 10 questions. For a comprehensive audit, consider a full readiness review with detailed stakeholder interviews, technical evaluation, and evidence-based control verification.
🔒 Privacy: All calculations run in your browser. We don't store or transmit your responses, and restarting clears any locally saved answers.